![]() ![]() Was used, and how those uses changed in the twentieth century. ![]() I will trace more generally how the word humanist Then I will take a closer look at Vox's 1954Ĭlassification scheme and its relationship to prevailing terminology in In this article, I will first look at the origins of the term Help account for the persistent attractiveness the term held forĬlassifiers of type designs in the twentieth century. Meanings of humanism in different contexts and at different times will Warranted its use in classifications thereafter. Term's connotations that made it attractive to Vox and that Specifically denotes certain fifteenth-century texts, it was the Given these vagaries of definition, it is worth asking how and why Same features that distinguish the faces later named humanist sans Moreover, the stylistic features thatĭistinguish a humanist serifed font in Vox's scheme are not the When it was, it sometimes referred to types other than those that Vox His influential 1954 classification scheme did not codify an alreadyĪccepted category before Vox, the term was rarely used for type, and However, historically its applications have been inconsistent.įor example, Maximilien Vox's employment of "humanes" in Humanist is a label commonly used to characterize type designs Research on the label "humanist" as applied to type. An examination of the historical contexts of olderĬlassification schemes shows that not only type design, but also typeĬlassification and labeling, are cultural products. Historical situations that shaped type categories and the terminology Preservationists and reformists alike have paid little attention to the Typefaces that populate the current world of typography. Responsive to the needs of typographers or to an understanding of the Or another, and often proposes a new scheme that is argued to be more The second camp argues thatĮxisting classifications of type designs are problematic for one reason Inherited set of categories that should be understood by the reader as Or similar instructional contexts, presents type classification as an The first, usually appearing in handbooks The classification of type designs seems to be a problem that is APA style: A history of the 'humanist' type classification.A history of the 'humanist' type classification." Retrieved from 2015 The American Printing History Association 01 Aug. MLA style: "A history of the 'humanist' type classification." The Free Library. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |